UKRAINIAN POLICY SHIFT: THE MEANING BEHIND TOP PERSONNEL CHANGES AMID THE GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 CRISIS


On 7 February 2020, Prime Minister Olexiy Goncharuk delivers the state of affairs report to the Rada. The report reflects the bleak overall situation in the country and the absence of ideas as to how to get out of the economic and social crisis.

On 11 February, Office of the President Chief of Staff (CoS) Andriy Bogdan is dismissed. А president’s friend, film producer Andriy Yermak is appointed as new CoS.

On 4 March, the Rada dismisses PM Goncharuk’s Cabinet of Ministers. Goncharuk is dismissed soon thereafter by the President.

The Rada appointed Denis Shmygal as the new PM. Shmygal is a short-term governor of Ivano-Frankivsk region, and a top manager of DTEK Corporation, which is owned by a key Ukrainian oligarch, Rinat Akhmetov.

These moves signify the start of major changes in the Ukrainian political environment—a new way in which the country will be managed, and a new direction in which the country will be moving  (At the time, this was not obvious).

Originally, President Zelenskiy was supported by two groups, one led by oligarch Igor Kolomoyskiy, and the other by oligarch Viktor Pinchuk. Under pressure from the West and, to a degree, from public opinion, Mr. Zelenskiy chose to limit dependence on Mr. Kolomoyskiy’s support. Mr. Pinchuk, who is closely connected to George Soros, offered support mostly in the form of cadres/personnel drawn from Soros-funded NGOs. PM Goncharuk’s Cabinet consisted almost exclusively of such individuals. Not surprisingly, the dismissal of Mr. Goncharuk and his cabinet was not well-received by globalists and United States Democrats. Meanwhile, President Zelenskiy’s relationship with President Trump and US Republicans was complicated from the outset, as President Trump’s impeachment case was constructed around that relationship.

Thus, the above changes to the Ukrainian government resulted in the following two outcomes for President Zelenskiy:

1. A new crisis in the Rada, where a large segment of the parliamentary majority faction, “Servant of the People,” is controlled by Pinchuk/Soros-linked members.

2. A looming foreign policy crisis in his relationships with Western powers.
President Zelenskiy had no choice but to seek support from parliamentary faction “For the Future,” which represents the interests of Mr. Kolomoyskiy, and also to assemble a new faction called “Trust,” which consists of representatives of different oligarchs, including an agricultural magnate from Poltava Andrey Verevskiy (Mr. Kolomoyskiy is also represented in this faction). Otherwise, the President-controlled segment of the “Servant of the People” faction would not have enough votes in the Rada to pass any president-supported legislative initiatives.

While the looming “Western front” crisis was stunted by 9 March “Black Monday” oil prices drop and the panic brought on by the coronavirus pandemic, both still hit Ukraine painfully. The drop in oil prices not only led to hryvna devaluation, but will surely continue to exacerbate the already near desperate Ukrainian economic situation, especially considering the fall in prices of major Ukrainian export commodities such as metal and grain. Meanwhile, the quarantine and economic decline in Europe dealt by the coronavirus has sent home several million Ukrainian guest workers who normally send billions of euros in remittances to the Ukrainian economy. These workers, now out of a job, must also now rely on an already overburdened Ukrainian system.

On 11 March, the Ukrainian Cabinet of Ministers announced quarantine and closures of “non-essential” venues and institutions. At this time, there was a single confirmed coronavirus case in Ukraine.

On 16 March, President Zelenskiy met with a group of oligarchs, including Rinat Akhmetov, Igor Kolomoyskiy and one of the ten richest Ukrainians Aleksandr Yaroslavkiy, and asked for monetary assistance. The oligarchs agreed.

Thus:

a. The consensus of oligarchs has become the main pillar of the Ukrainian government’s power.

b. The role and the significance of Western support of the Ukrainian government have declined.
On 17 March, the Supreme Rada:

  1. Introduced new, more stringent quarantine measures. (Such measures allow the oligarchs to protect their assets and influence while destroying competition in business and social spheres. The fact that Ukrainians who massively return from Europe are not being quarantined suggests the quarantine’s political and economic versus counter-epidemic purpose.
  2. Appointed a new General Prosecutor (an Attorney General equivalent), Iryna Venediktova, a former short-term Acting Head of the State Bureau of Investigations who had declared readiness to prosecute ex-president Poroshenko and radical nationalists.
  3. Appointed a new Minister of Economy, Igor Petrashko, a protégé of agricultural oligarch Oleg Bakhmatyuk.
  4. Immediately, the territory of Ukraine was divided into “curatorships” among the leading oligarchs. For example, President Zelenskiy appointed Rinat Akhmetov an official “curator” of the Donetsk, Luhansk, Lviv and Ivano-Frankivsk regions, where his major assets are located. Others received their territorial “curatorships” respectively.
A country-wide state of emergency was declared. Most Ukrainian regions had introduced regional emergency-situation status before that.

A NEWLY-FOUND UKRAINIAN “SELF-SUFFICIENCY”

So what happened?

Ukrainian authorities have changed their orientation from counting on Western support, which had been their sole mindset since 2014, to a new paradigm of autarky, i.e. support through Ukraine's own oligarchs. Such an orientation has not been in place since 2004. (On a side note, this seems counter to the maidan objectives.)

Even though the Ukrainian oligarchs’ businesses are closely connected with the West, there is difference:

  1. Ukrainian oligarchy, as distinguished from transnational capital, is absolutely anchored to Ukraine. It has a vested interest in keeping Ukraine afloat.
  2. Ukrainian oligarchy’s managers - Mr. Akhmetov’s companies being a good example - are indeed top-notch, well-trained and competent, unlike the West-sponsored NGO alumni ministers of the Mr. Goncharuk’s cabinet.
  3. Ukrainian oligarchy has a vital interest in restoring economic ties with Russia and finding a compromise on the future of Donbass. Unconfirmed information suggests that Mr. Akhmetov has already partially restored the management of his assets that had been nationalized by LPR and DPR.
WILD CARDS AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS

However, this policy shift cannot be considered completed, as a number of issues remain unresolved:

a. Radical nationalists’ influence on the Ukrainian political process. Ukrainian neo-Nazi groups such as the Praviy Sektor, the Azov, the Natsionalniy Korpus, et al. are numerous, well-organize, well-equipped, well-funded, and are capable of exerting pressure on any political or civic leader, organization, and even government agencies such as courts. Today, the majority of radical nationalists are under the control of the Minister of Internal Affairs, Arsen Avakov. In order to complete the shift, it is necessary to either remove or critically weaken Mr. Avakov and dismiss the nationalist formations. At this time it is hardly achievable, as the “oligarchy consensus” is satisfied with Mr. Avakov, and there is no one to replace such a gifted manager and politician.

b. Talks with the IMF over a new tranche of loans are ongoing. In this context, the IMF is recommending that Ukraine open its agricultural land market, and, demanding the adoption of a package of new banking laws. One of the key points of the latter is to forbid the government of Ukraine to reimburse Mr. Kolomoyskiy the losses he incurred when his Privatbank was nationalized at the insistence of the West. Meeting this demand is likely to undermine the very existence of the “oligarchy consensus,” along with President Zelenskiy’s credibility with its members. (A new tranche/loan may not save the Ukrainian economy in any case. Any loan would need to be accompanied by a rise in oil prices, which is questionable. Therefore, the Ukrainian government may see no sense in fulfilling the IMF’s demands.)

c. Strengthening of the quarantine provided an optimal background for wider constitutional changes. Already, there are more and more demands to expand presidential and governmental powers.

CRITICAL RISKS

In the current situation in Ukraine, there are (at least) two significant risk factors that Ukrainian authorities either do not realize or simply ignore:

a. The Ukrainian central government’s power is currently disrupted due to the discontinuation of inter-regional transportation, along with a recent strengthening of regional authorities. Regional governments, as an example, are themselves declaring local states of emergency. Meanwhile, local governments are unhappy with Kiev due to the redirection of local land tax revenue to the central government, which severely impacted local budgets. Regional governments need funding from the central government’s budget, while regional governments are still controlled by the oligarchs. However, in the event that the central government cannot provide funds, and oligarch-owned businesses grind to a halt, consequences on regional levels could be dramatic. In such event, the forbidden topic of federalization may re-emerge. The unacceptability of the very idea of federalization by new Ukrainian elite had been one of the primary drivers behind the violent events of 2014 that led to the current civil war in Eastern Ukraine. In the present conditions, that may become one of unplanned outcomes.

b. Mr. Avakov, whose power has significantly strengthened in recent months, may attempt a small coup to become the Number One. His current calls for imposing a strict Italian-type quarantine, with the closure of all manufacturing, etc., may imply just that. The long-suffering Ukrainian population, which is also scared of the coronavirus, may actually support the emergence of a strong-arm leader. On March 28, Mr. Avakov publicly announced that he was not planning a coup d'état. What he meant by that, remains to be seen.