Posts

-
Image
The Ingrates Why Washington Tolerates Zelenskiy “Zelenskiy must go.” A year and a half ago, Trump meant leaving the White House, after he threw Zelenskiy out for his rudeness to Vice President JD Vance. This time, the instruction concerns the presidency. “Ukraine needs a new leader capable of making deals,” the American president declared. He backed his words by halting the transfer of intelligence to the Kiev regime, including advance warnings of Russian ballistic missile strikes, and restricting the bandwidth of the Starlink systems on which communications throughout the Ukrainian Armed Forces depend. Ukraine consequently lost the ability to conduct a number of terrorist operations against Russia, operations on which it has built its military strategy. Those measures raise a question that extends beyond the latest quarrel: why has Washington tolerated such behavior for so long, and what still limits its willingness to confront it? The United States possesses substantial lever...
Read more
-
Image
The Spectacle of the Scaffold Why Broadcasting an Execution Corrodes the Soul The argument should begin with the people Nidal Malik Hasan murdered. Thirteen were killed at Fort Hood in 2009: twelve service members and one civilian. Their families have lived with the consequences ever since. Hasan’s guilt was established by a military court, and the Army has scheduled his execution by firing squad for December 3, 2026. ( AP News ) Those facts deserve to remain at the center of the discussion. Every person killed had a life extending far beyond the circumstances of that death. The families are entitled to their grief and anger. Forgiveness, should it ever come, belongs to them; politicians and commentators have no authority to demand it. The Pentagon’s announced intention to livestream the execution introduces a separate decision: to make the destruction of a human life available for public consumption. Trump has subsequently said he is still considering whether to authorize the broadcas...
Read more
-
Image
The Winter Respite Why Truce Consultations Mask Strategic Attrition in Ukraine Diplomatic channels around Ukraine remain active. Russian envoys have met with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, while Ukrainian officials have conducted trilateral consultations with the United States and the European Union. Moscow continues to insist publicly on a durable settlement, warning that another operational breathing space would give Kiev and its sponsors time to replenish their resources. The fundamental distance between Russian and Ukrainian terms makes comprehensive peace negotiations an unlikely immediate outcome. These contacts serve more immediate purposes. Kiev needs to survive the winter, prevent a destabilizing exodus from the capital and other major cities along the Dnieper, and secure financial commitments before Western governments finish allocating their next budgets. A diplomatic process becomes particularly valuable when continued funding depends on demonstrating that there wil...
Read more
-
Image
The Diesel Pivot Trump, Moscow, and the Ukrainian Endgame Donald Trump has supplied a remarkably practical definition of allied solidarity. Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries become a problem when American farmers receive the bill. On October 10, he accused Zelenskiy of disrupting diesel supplies, passing up opportunities to settle the war, and making life harder for American farmers and ranchers. His proposed remedy extended to Ukrainian personnel policy: “I think it’s time for Ukraine to get a new president.” ( Scripps News ) The remarks followed Trump’s announcement of a diesel agreement with Vladimir Putin. The administrative machinery moved with unusual speed: on October 9, the U.S. Treasury issued General License 135, authorizing transactions involving Russian-origin diesel, including imports into the United States, through April 7, 2027. A presidential conversation had acquired a legal instrument that traders could actually use. For Kiev, the uncomfortable implication is th...
Read more
-
Image
The Arctic Bargain The Strategic Realities of Washington’s Greenland Accord From "The Arctic Bargain: The Strategic Realities of Washington’s Greenland Accord" (2026). By permission of Gulfstream Foundation . On September 22, 2026, President Donald Trump, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, and Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen signed a new Greenland defense agreement at United Nations headquarters in New York. Its entry into force requires completion of the necessary parliamentary procedures in Denmark and Greenland, followed by formal notification to Washington. The diplomatic celebrations arrived with rather greater speed. ( Prime Minister's Office ) The White House presented the accord as a historic guarantee of American security interests. Copenhagen emphasized the preservation of sovereignty and territorial integrity. Nuuk highlighted recognition of Greenlandic self-determination. Each government found a victory suitable for domestic consumption...
Read more
-
Kiev’s Bridge Problem The Dnieper Equation Russian forces have begun systematic strikes on Kiev’s bridges. Road traffic across the Dnieper in the capital’s vicinity is consequently approaching a complete shutdown. Broadly speaking, disabling the city’s road bridges would be enough to paralyze government operations and most businesses in the Ukrainian capital. Two of these bridges also carry metro lines. With at least a third of Kiev’s population living on the left bank and working on the right, the resulting transport breakdown would make normal administrative and economic activity impossible. Zelenskiy has already raised the possibility of evacuating government institutions from Kiev. In his interpretation, “Putin is trying to drive us out of Kiev.” The practical meaning is clear enough: the Ukrainian authorities are preparing for the possibility that they will lose the ability to use the capital as the country’s administrative center and be forced to leave. This would follow from...
Read more
-
Image
The End of Easy Answers The Future Has Other Authors Many brilliant minds are trying to understand how the world is navigating its overlapping crises. The central observation is that the world has become complex. We are beginning to grow accustomed to that complexity, and the age of simple solutions is over for good. The twentieth century gave humanity a great deal. It also encouraged the belief that even the most fundamental questions could have simple answers: one merely had to choose the correct ideology. Capitalism and communism initially competed for the privilege of supplying the universal prescription. The final attempt to simplify everything came with the liberal globalism of the post-Cold War era. That prescription also failed. We are now learning to live in a world where even the most difficult and dangerous developments can be discussed with composure. This helps explain why intellectual debate is increasingly occupied with questions that would have seemed almost unthinkable...
Read more